‘V’ is not only for ‘Vendetta,’ it’s vivid

When the writer of an original work denounces himself from the movie and numerous re-shoots are needed because of casting changes, most would lose faith in a movie. But for those associated with the graphic book turned movie “V for Vendetta,” the process was a labor of love.
Directed by James McTeigue, assistant director for the Matrix trilogy and Star Wars prequels and screenplay writers Andy and Larry Wachowskis, who wrote and directed “The Matrix”, Vendetta is the film adaptation of the graphic novel written by Alan Moore.
The movie centers around a mysterious freedom fighter named V, who dons a Guy Fawkes mask (Fawkes was a key conspirer in the Gun Power to blow up British Parliament in 1605), who is played by Hugo Weaving, known for his role in the Matrix trilogy.
V is on a mission to destroy an evil totalitarian government in Britain, as well as change the life of Evey, portrayed by Natalie Portman of the Star Wars prequels and “Garden State” fame.
Like “The Matrix,” “Vendetta” is a thinking man’s action movie. Tackling controversial subjects such as terrorism vs. heroism, political corruption and media propaganda, if you are expecting all-out action and sparse dialogue, you will be disappointed.
“Vendetta” has the best acting of 2006 yet. Weaving as V handles the Shakespearian dialogue with a very cool and stylish flare. Portman handles Evey with the same emotional unstable sweetness in the graphic novel with grace. And praise goes to British actor Stephen Fry (“Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy”) who provides the comic relief as TV executive Deitrich who aids in V’s efforts.
The acting is superb, the action scenes are creative and provide the viewer with plenty bloodshed. And despite the movie being 75 percent “by-the-book,” many Sept. 11 references are made.
On a smaller note, while the graphic novel allows the reader to see V’s character as a terrorist, hero, anarchist and the overall antagonist, the movie makes him a heroic freedom fighter that is a protagonist against the media.
The movie, which runs at 130 minutes, was well worth the wait because this is the best movie of 2006. There is no doubt this movie will spark debate after the viewing and if so, great.